Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scriptural reasoning: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Carpathy2009 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 29:
*'''Strong Keep''' Yes, the page needs drastic cleaning, but that's never rationale to delete, it's rationale to improve. I am finding a number of good sources, with minimal effort. I am finding sources, like: [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118602388/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0], [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/ijpt/2007/00000001/00000001/art00005], and [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118602393/abstract] that are written specifically about this topic. There are countless sources that mention it in broader contexts too. [[User:Cazort|Cazort]] ([[User talk:Cazort|talk]]) 20:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
:::::Thanks [[User:Cazort|Cazort]] the articles turned up by your search by David Ford and Peter Ochs are from founders of the "Society for Scriptural Reasoning". While there is prolific material published by this [http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/journals/jsrforum/participating.html same group], I think the point being made above is the absence of much third party analysis other than from this small group, other than promotional news interviews, etc. If you scan the reference list of [[Scriptural Reasoning]] there is a superabundance of articles by the same group of authors. --[[User:Scripturalreasoning|Scripturalreasoning]] ([[User talk:Scripturalreasoning|talk]]) 20:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
| |||