Content deleted Content added
→Vandalism: a brief return to reality |
|||
Line 222:
This was the [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/FuelWagon 2]] RfC filed against me by SlimVirgin, Jayjg and cabal. Jayjg attempted to remove my endorsement of an outside comment by Vizcarra. That Vizcarra was critical of the RfC against me and the people who filed it, that Vizcarra was supportive of me, likely had everything to do with the fact that Jayjg attempted to slip this over to the talk page. I await the spin machine to tell me why Jayjg is excluded from his removal of my endorsement from being labeled the simple vandalism that it is. [[User:FuelWagon|FuelWagon]] 04:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
:That was the same comment you had inserted a number of times before, was not numbered as an endorsement, and started with "Just a note to point out etc."; I removed your comment, just as you removed other comments. Oh, and I have not filed any RfC against you - in fact, Carbonite filed the RfC against you. I'm not even an endorser of the RfC. It no longer astonishes me that you try to get away this this kind of spin, but it still surprises me that you think others will be fooled by it. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 05:39, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
:::''That was the same comment you had inserted a number of times before,'' Wrong, the history is shown below. I ''NEVER'' moved ''ANY'' comments from the talk page to teh article page, except for this endorsement. And I only did that ''ONCE''.
:::''was not numbered as an endorsement,'' Sure, and the last sentence that says "I endorse" was... ''what'' exactly? A declaration of ''non-endorsement''?
:::''and started with "Just a note to point out etc.";'' Yeah, just a note to point out the only thing that I did ''not'' endorse about Vizcarra's comment. I endorsed everything else about his comment.
:::''I removed your comment, just as you removed other comments.'' No, you removed my ''endorsement''. I removed threaded comments that were combative or disagreeing with whatever the previous statement was. I ''agreed'' with Vizcarra, I ''endorsed'' his comment. But you remove my endorsement. SlimVirgin ''disagreed'' with my comment, she ''disagreed'' with Vizcarra's comment, and you ''reinserted'' that comment.
:::''Oh, and I have not filed any RfC against you - in fact, Carbonite filed the RfC against you. I'm not even an endorser of the RfC.'' I feel so sorry for someone with such a terrible short term [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/FuelWagon_2&oldid=25761891#Users_certifying_the_basis_for_this_dispute memory]. You are now listed as the number one [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/FuelWagon_2#Other_users_who_endorse_this_summary endorser] of the RfC.
:::''It no longer astonishes me that you try to get away this this kind of spin, but it still surprises me that you think others will be fooled by it.'' It no longer surprises me that you violate RfC procedures with impunity, directly violating the requirement to keep threaded comments on the talk page. It no longer surprises me that you ''vandalized'' the RfC against me by removing an ''endorsement'' to talk page, yet are enough of an old-timer that vandalism rules won't be applied to you. It no longer surprises me that you would put so much spin on your own defense that youd blatantly ''lie'' by saying it was "the same comment you had inserted a number of times before" when the edit history below clearly shows your lie, that you blatantly ''lie'' saying "I'm not even an endorser of the RfC" when the links show you first tried to ''certify'' this RfC and are now the number 1 endorser. And it no longer surprises me that in spite of these blatant lies with diffs to prove you are the one lying here, ''you'' have the gall to say '''I''' am the one putting the spin on things. [[User:FuelWagon|FuelWagon]] 06:17, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
==edit war, vandalism==
| |||