Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Initial discussion: this is flogging a dead horse: keep the RfC to what we ''don't'' know already, and keep it as simple as possible |
Locke Cole (talk | contribs) →Initial discussion: thanks Tony! |
||
Line 33:
Arthur Rubin does not seem to agree with you on this point, and I suspect he would not go along with yet ''another'' RfC on the same issue. (Does he?) Are you the only one, Cole? Tiring out WPians, asking them back and back again to respond to the same issue, will quickly degrade the results (many people will spurn the RfC if we're not careful—perhaps you want that?). Better, as dabomb hints at, to focus on more fine-grained stuff that has ''not'' already been decided. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 04:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
:You're quite right Tony, as consensus has not been established to remove all auto formatting, we don't need to waste the communities time by asking them again. We can safely continue with developing and implementing a new auto formatting system until such time as you get community consensus to totally remove the system. Thank you for making this simpler. —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 06:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
==Wording and structural issues==
| |||