Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
miscellaneous fixups |
||
Line 1:
Primitive recursive [[function|functions]] are a class of functions which, while a [[subset]] of the [[computable functions|recursive]]
functions (which
which we call "[[
on the way to a full formalization of computability.
Line 17:
Line 27:
Where the "successor function" takes the number ''k'' and returns the number
one greater than ''k'' on the natural [[number line]], and the "projection
functions" ''P''<sub>''i''</sub><sup>''n''</sup> take n arguments and return the ''i''th one.
Line 37:
#''Composition'': Given ''f'' a ''k''-[[arity|ary]] p.r. function and ''k'' ''l''-ary functions ''g''<sub>0</sub>,...,''g''<sub>''k''-1</sub> p.r. functions, the [[composition]] of ''f'' with ''g''<sub>0</sub>,...,''g''<sub>''k''-1</sub> is p.r., i.e. the function ''h''(''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>1</sub>)=''f''(''g''<sub>0</sub>(''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>1</sub>),...,''g''<sub>''k''-1</sub>(''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>''l''-1</sub>)) is p.r.
#''Primitive recursion'': Given ''f'' a ''k''-ary p.r. function and ''g'' a (''k''+2)-ary p.r. function, then the (''k''+1)-ary function defined as the primitive recursion of ''f'' and ''g'' is p.r., i.e. the function ''h'' where ''h''(0,''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>''k''-1</sub>)=f(''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>''k''-1</sub>) and ''h''(''n''+1,''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>''k''-1</sub>)=''g''(''n'',''h''(''n'',''x''<sub>0</sub>,...,''x''<sub>''k''-1</sub>),''x''<sub>0</sub>,''x''<sub>''k''-1</sub>)) is p.r.
Line 55:
Line 71:
Primitive recursive functions tend to correspond very closely with our intuition of what a computable function must be. Certainly the initial set of functions are intuitively computable (in their very simplicity), and the two operations by which one can create new p.r. functions are also very straight-forward. However the set of p.r. functions does not include every possible computable function -- this can be seen with a variant of [[Cantors Diagonal argument|Cantor's diagonalization argument]].
(''need outline of proof/explanation'')▼
|