Revision as of 03:45, 11 March 2009 edit Hex (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 25,702 edits →Points removed from year markup disadvantages: Add Ckatz's comment. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:47, 14 March 2009 edit undo Arthur Rubin (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 130,168 edits →Clerk: new section Next edit →
Line 92: This poorly-worded assertion (what "syntax" is made more complicated? Are you trying to say that the text editing area is cluttered by extra brackets? If so, say it) is entirely unproven. Also, as Ckatz [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ryan_Postlethwaite/Draft_RfC&diff=276440485&oldid=276440003 comments], so does the syntax for linking, bold and italic formatting, templates, headers, and every other bit of Wiki code. -- [[User:Earle Martin\|Earle Martin]] [<sup>[[User_talk:Earle Martin\|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Earle_Martin\|c]]</sub>] 03:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC) == Clerk == If that isn't a statement by Ryan (it looks similar, but not identical, to some statements made by Ryan as a ''proposed'' neutral statement), it needs to be clearly marked '''proposed wording'''. — [[User:Arthur Rubin\|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin\|(talk)]] 01:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions