Revision as of 09:11, 15 March 2009 edit Hex (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 25,702 edits →Points removed from year markup disadvantages: I don't think so. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:20, 15 March 2009 edit undo Sssoul (talk \| contribs) 6,886 edits →Points removed from year markup disadvantages: reply Next edit →
Line 96: ::Indeed, Sssoul has said it well. [[User:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 08:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC) :::No, the onus is on you to explain how linking to a year is somehow of such fiendish complexity that it merits being claimed as a "disadvantage". -- [[User:Earle Martin\|Earle Martin]] [<sup>[[User_talk:Earle Martin\|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Earle_Martin\|c]]</sub>] 09:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC) ::::it doesn't have to be "proven" to be "fiendish". some editors perceive the added complication & instruction creep as disadvantages. even if you personally disagree, those <u>are</u> among the perceived disadvantages. [[User:Sssoul\|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul\|talk]]) 10:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC) == Clerk ==

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions