Restrictions on the import of cryptography: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rationale: "without the country" doesn't make sense in context.
Dunxd (talk | contribs)
Added a possibly useful link, and clarified some the speculations on why restrictions may exists (is this even worth having?)
Line 3:
==Rationale==
Countries may wish to restrict import of cryptography technologies for a number of reasons:
* Cryptography may entailincrease alevels right toof privacy thatwithin isthe notcountry presentbeyond withinwhat the countrygovernment wishes.
* Use of cryptography can enable citizens to hide data from the government.
** Criminals can hide information on their operations.
** Dissidents can anonymously communicate with each other, preventing government from apprehendingmonitoring them.
** Encrypted transactions may hamper attempts to monitor the statusactivities of business within the country.
* Terrorists within the country canmay use encrypted transmissions to communicate with other members withinboth in and out of the country.
 
{{Expand-section|date=June 2008}}
 
==Status by country==
Line 179 ⟶ 177:
* ''[http://www.gilc.org/crypto/crypto-survey.html Cryptography and Liberty 1998, GILC Report]''
* ''[http://rechten.uvt.nl/koops/cryptolaw/ Crypto-Law survey 2008]
* ''[http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_1319021.asp Citrix list of restricted countries] - has no explanation of sources of the information or distinction over whether or not the restrictions are on export from certain locations (e.g. USA), or local importation restrictions.
 
[[Category:Cryptography law]]