Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:16, 19 March 2009

Revision as of 19:28, 19 March 2009

Line 299:

::* That’s fine, Ryan. It seemed like the venue was becoming a sandbox where any old proposal was being tossed into the ring. Arthur’s proposal makes the voting more complex because instead of a simple up/down vote, there is now a mix. I just wanted to make sure ''you'', Ryan, were happy with this additional complexity; you clearly are and that’s all I wanted to make sure of: that the addition was by your hand (or with your blessing). <span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''[[User:Greg L|Greg L]]''' ([[User_talk:Greg_L|talk]])</span> 15:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

::::Ryan, I may have over-reacted. However, it has been open to anyone to write proposed texts, and you were rather strong in saying "back off" and stating that Greg and I have prevented other viewpoints—I see plenty of hacking about of the text written by anti-linking people by Cole, KatzCkatz et al. Some of this I believe is most unfair, but we have compromised. Are you going to tell ''them'' to "back off"? [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 16:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

== another question ==