Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Year links: specificity as to who
Line 138:
 
:::::…would have been a non sequitur that ran flagrantly contrary to the fundamental principle unless it was clearly declared as “an exception to the rule.” Seeing such a small number of editors who suggested that this exception be made, and since it so clearly runs foul with the basic principle that links should be germane and topical, I’ve struck it.<p>I think leaving it off will result in greater support in the RfC. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">'''[[User:Greg L|Greg L]]''' ([[User_talk:Greg_L|talk]])</span> 20:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 
::::::I will admit that I put it in there largely to compromise at the time. I will revisit that. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 19:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 
== Two queries ==