Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Truth in advertising: okay |
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) →Truth in advertising: truth |
||
Line 344:
::::...thanks - although it sounds as if you consider my question somehow insulting, which is not how it was meant. [[User:Sssoul|Sssoul]] ([[User talk:Sssoul|talk]]) 08:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::I don't consider it insulting — I'm sorry if I gave that impression. I ''do'' consider it unfair, as the date delinkers' position also differs from the standards for other links in MOSLINK, even after they've altered ''that'' to remove any traces of [[WT:BTW]] that was also a guideline of sorts. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 08:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
==Year links==
| |||