Revision as of 14:38, 21 March 2009 edit Tony1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 279,133 edits →Year links ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:42, 21 March 2009 edit undo Dabomb87 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 66,457 edits →Year links: comment Next edit →
Line 369: BTW, I enjoy Greg's "coarse" references, whether they're directed at me or others: this is not a nunnery, and there's scope for a little bawdiness when experienced editors use it to spice up proceedings. [[User:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1\|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 14:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC) :I think that it would be better to take the structure of 1345, apply it to [[1340s]], and merge the year articles of the 1340s into the decade article; this way, we wouldn't face so much redundancy. [[User:Dabomb87\|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87\|talk]]) 14:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll/Archive 1: Difference between revisions