Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Autoformatting responses: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
oppose |
|||
Line 7:
=====I oppose the general concept of autoformatting=====
#If [https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582#c65 Brion thinks] that Autoformatting should be removed, that's good enough for me. I think the benefits of autoformatting do not outweigh the trouble implementing it will cause, such as tagging millions of dates with a marker to allow autoformatting. <font face="Verdana" color="blue">[[User:Steve Crossin|Steve Crossin]] <sup>[[User talk:Steve Crossin|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]</sup>'''/'''<sub>[[WP:24|<font color="#CCC000">24</font>]]</sub></font> 23:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
# Per all of the arguments against. We don't need more options. Neither of the accepted date styles are difficult to understand. I think we should continue to move away from the ISO style and we shouldn't be relying on autoformatting for consistency. [[User:Rambo's Revenge|<b><font color="#DC143C">Rambo's</font></b>]] [[User talk:Rambo's Revenge|<b><font color="#FF4500">Revenge</font></b>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Rambo's Revenge|<small><b><font color="#FFA500">(How am I doing?)</font></b></small>]] 23:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
#
=====I am neutral on the general concept of autoformatting=====
#
| |||