Revision as of 00:36, 30 March 2009 view source MDCollins (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 9,535 edits →I oppose the general concept of autoformatting: oppose ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:46, 30 March 2009 view source NuclearWarfare (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled 83,665 edits →I oppose the general concept of autoformatting: oppose Next edit →
Line 29: #Oppose. If Wikipedia readers are smart enough to handle "colour" vs "color" and "aluminium" vs "aluminum", they can handle "30 March" vs "March 30". On that premise, I would apply the [[KISS principle]] and avoid the added complexity. -- [[User:Tcncv\|Tcncv]] ([[User talk:Tcncv\|talk]]) 00:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC) #'''Oppose''': there is no need for autoformatting. As already mentioned, it enhances the differences between the registered and unregistered uses, masking any potential inconsistencies. Every article should be consistent, using [[WP:MOSNUM]] and [[WP:ENGVAR]].—[[User:Mdcollins1984\|MDCollins]] ([[User talk:Mdcollins1984\|talk]]) 00:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC) #Per Tcncv. <font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare\|NuclearWarfare]]</font>''''' <sub>(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare\|Talk]]</font>)</sub>''''' 00:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC) =====I am neutral on the general concept of autoformatting=====

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Autoformatting responses: Difference between revisions