Revision as of 22:16, 31 March 2009 edit Grutness (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 319,866 edits →{{tl\|Folklore-stub}} ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:02, 1 April 2009 edit undo Piotrus (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 290,464 edits →{{tl\|Austria-Hungary-stub}} Next edit →
Line 35: Former country stub. [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Austria-Hungary&basedeep=3&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en CatScan found 156 articles].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus\|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]\|[[User_talk:Piotrus\|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC) I have nothing against former nation stubs. However having looked at the first 10 articles I think 6/7 of them are probably not related to the Empire. If 60 articles can be found, then I think a note on the category to the effect that only articles related to the Empire. [[User:Waacstats\|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats\|talk]]) 20:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Indeed, the category system fails somewhat here, but still I can see quite a few articles that could use this category. After, AH was a modern European country with over a century of history - I am sure there will be more then 50 stubs for years to come. Here are some subcategories that total about 40 stubs: [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=+Culture+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=History+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Politics+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en]. Further, I can point out one error with current stub categories: [[:Category:Austro-Hungarian people]] is underutilized; I can think of many bios of Polish people from AH partition that were never categorized in it as I (having written dozens of such bios) didn't realize it existed. I could've used such an AH stub on many an article. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus\|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]\|[[User_talk:Piotrus\|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 02:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC) I'm a little uneasy about starting stub types for "defunct countries", as it were, but if we do, this should comply with the naming conventions for stubs and be at {{tl\|AustriaHungary-stub}} - or even at {{tl\|AustroHungarianEmpire-stub}}, since that seems to be more pertinent to what the stub would actually be for. [[User:Grutness\|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness\|wha?]]</font></small>'' 22:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC) *As the name of the nation is [[Austria–Hungary]], I think it AustriaHungary-stub would be more correct.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus\|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]\|[[User_talk:Piotrus\|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 02:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC) ==={{tl\|Earwig-stub}}===

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/March: Difference between revisions