Revision as of 11:40, 7 April 2009 edit Krischik (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,637 edits m →maybe because there noting wrong worth mentioning: layout ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:01, 7 April 2009 edit undo Karel Bílek (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,353 edits →maybe because there noting wrong worth mentioning Next edit →
Line 373: --[[User:Krischik\|Krischik]] <sup>[[User_talk:Krischik\|T]]</sup> 11:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC) : So, at least, include some part, explaining or mentioning, why is Ada NOT widely used today. (It is not.) Are there historical reasons - and FUD? Probably ... but it should be, at least, mentioned. I won't do it, I don't have the needed knowledge. And I never said there is something ''substantially wrong with Ada''. --''[[Aum\|Have a nice day]]''. [[User:Running\|Running]] 19:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Ada (programming language): Difference between revisions