Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→{{tl|canada-abp-stub}}: Thresholds for the creation of an Aboriginal peoples in Canada-stub |
|||
Line 1,312:
::I think that we have to continue discussing this proposal. The proposal itself doesn't seem to face any objections, but there are some differences of opinion as to what the template should be called. I think we need to find some common ground before proceeding with creating the stubs. It might be wise to drop Canada-indigenous-stub, although I don't know whether BL and Caerwine agree with me on this one. I think we should focus on Canada-ethno-stub and what I will call "an aboriginal stub". [[User:Aecis|Aecis]] [[User_talk:Aecis|<sup>praatpaal</sup>]] 14:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
:::I concur that dropping Canada-indigenous-stub from consideration would be useful in focusing our discussion. Of those in favour of {{tl|Canada-ethno-stub}}, would any be in favour of the simultaneous creation of {{tl|Canada-ethno-stub}} and {{tl|Canada-Aboriginal-stub}}? I would support this dual-stub creation. For those against this creation of two stubs, at what number of {{tl|Canada-ethno-stub}} articles would you support the creation of a split-off {{tl|Canada-Aboriginal-stub}}? [[User:Kurieeto|Kurieeto]] 02:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
:::And/or, at what number of articles where an Aboriginal peoples in Canada-stub would be the most specific and appropriate would you support its creation? Currently 63 have been listed. [[User:Kurieeto|Kurieeto]] 14:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
I generally concur with the Canada-Aboriginal-stub idea. But if that can't get consensus, what about using the phrase First Nations? As in, ''This article related to First Nations in Canada is a stub.'' This seems to be an acceptable terminology to Indian Affairs Canada ([http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/mand_e.pdf PDF of IANAC's mandate). Do note that the term is not seen to include Inuit peoples. -[[User:Joshuapaquin|Joshuapaquin]] 01:47, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
:Also note that IANAC seems to like "Aboriginal" more, consider [http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/nr/prs/j-a2005/2-02635_e.html this press release] with five uses of the word. -[[User:Joshuapaquin|Joshuapaquin]] 01:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
| |||