Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→{{tl|canada-abp-stub}}: Thresholds for the creation of an Aboriginal peoples in Canada-stub |
Luigizanasi (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1,317:
::The term "Aboriginal" isn't blocking consensus currently. The roadblock is debate regarding if a {{tl|Canada-ethno-stub}} should be created before a {{tl|Canada-Aboriginal-stub}}, with a {{tl|Canada-Aboriginal-stub}} being broken off once there is an excess of articles in {{tl|Canada-ethno-stub}}. The roadblock would remain if the scope of the proposed stub was reduced to just the First Nations. [[User:Kurieeto|Kurieeto]] 02:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
:I'd also favour -ethno-, for consistency of naming (hence increasing the chances of people using it, and using it correctly) and inclusivity. Opposed to -abp-, excessively cryptic. [[User:Alai|Alai]] 03:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
:I would favour -ethno- for consistency across Wikipedia and to avoid stub proliferation. We need a place to put First Nations plus we need a place for the [[Portuguese-Canadian]]s, [[Armenian-Canadian]]s, etc. I don't think there is any point at this stage to have more than one stub category. If we ended up with a couple of hundred First Nations stubs and a large number (100+) of other ethic stubs, we could revisit at that point. [[User:Luigizanasi|Luigizanasi]] 16:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
==={{tl|reli-bio-stub}} splits===
| |||