Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Luigizanasi (talk | contribs) |
Bjelleklang (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1,669:
:::I also don't like the proposed division of jets into three rather arbitrary stubs, especially since most of the jet aircraft articles are not stubs. The writers of aerocruft have been very busy writing good and complete articles about modern military and passenger aircraft. Each of the aircraft mentioned in the three jet sub types above as examples have lengthy non-stub articles. I'd actually be more worried whether we actually have 60 stubs about jet aircraft than whether we should have three separate stubs.
:::Finally, I don't like the proposed {{tl|misc-aero-stub}}. Isn't that just simply {{tl|aero-stub}}? [[User:Caerwine|Caerwine]] 23:27, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
::::Don't mind combining both milstubs into {{tl|mil-aero-stub}} (including {{tl|bomber-aero-stub}}),. What about dropping the categories I mentioned earlier, and settling on {{tl|GA-aero-stub}} for General Aviation, {{tl|Airliner-aero-stub}} for airliners/commuter aircraft, {{tl|Cargo-aero-stub}} for freight/cargo aircraft with their own stubs, as well as {{tl|rotorcraft-aero-stub}} for rotorcraft, leaving gliders, airships and other rare types in {{tl|aero-stub}}?
The only problem as such I could see here, is certain airliners that has been modified to be used in the cargo role as well. This is easily fixed, as they would a) be a seperate stub, or b) be included as a subchapter of the aircraft type. [[User:Bjelleklang|Bjelleklang]] - [[User_talk:Bjelleklang|talk]] 16:17, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
==={{tl|soundtrack-stub}}===
| |||