Revision as of 19:31, 10 April 2009 view source EEng (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 99,790 edits →I support Option #1 (link only relevant years): Put an end to this silly overlinking. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:20, 11 April 2009 view source Auntof6 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 74,866 edits →I support Option #4 (removal of guidance): my vote Next edit →
Line 285: #I would almost go with Option 3, but if a year link is relevant twice or more in an article it'd be good to link it twice; this is not the case for month/days. Therefore, I '''support''' this option, seeing as it's the most likely way such would be encouraged.[[User:Simplebutpowerful\|Simple]]<sub>[[User talk:Simplebutpowerful\|but]]</sub>[[Special:Contributions/Simplebutpowerful\|powerful]] 00:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC) #'''Support''' As Guyzero expressed it above: "Let editors determine appropriate implementation at the article or project level. Content discussions are not under the purview of MOS." Thanks, [[User:LiniShu\|Lini]] ([[User talk:LiniShu\|talk]]) 01:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) #'''Support''' I've never understood the need for these links. --[[User:Auntof6\|Auntof6]] ([[User talk:Auntof6\|talk]]) 07:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC) =====Other comments=====

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Year-linking responses: Difference between revisions