Revision as of 16:43, 11 April 2009 edit Mzajac (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 66,545 edits m →The statement for doesn't know it's ass from a hole in the ground: Statement for is biased and fallacious: creative content is not a “user interface”) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:45, 11 April 2009 edit undo Mzajac (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 66,545 edits m →Statement for is biased and fallacious: creative content is not a “user interface”: m. Next edit →
Line 369: ====== Statement for is biased and fallacious: creative content is not a “user interface” ====== [[#Statement for]] betrays the wrong attitude that readers and editors are “users”, and that my creative contribution, protected by the GPL, is a “user interface” which should be rewritten by a machine to support “user preferences”. “Personalized date formats in operating systems” don't rewrite the books you are reading or correct the language in music you listen to. This ~~side of the vote~~explanation is biased and fallacious, and is misleading editors who read it and vote. ''—[[User:Mzajac \|Michael]] [[User talk:Mzajac \|Z.]] <small>2009-04-11 16:41 z</small>''

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions