Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:35, 12 April 2009

Revision as of 00:31, 13 April 2009

Line 254:

#'''Support'''; these links are usually unnecessary. Option 4 would be fine too. --[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]^{[[:wikisource:User:Spangineer|ws]]}&nbsp;<small><font color="brown">[[User talk:Spangineer|(háblame)]]</font></small> 19:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

#'''Support''' - I expect that hardly ever would these links be appropriate. &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

#'''Support''' This strikes me as the best option of the four. Removing all date linking is too harsh, offering no guidance is a mess, and allowing the first date reference to be linked is useful for years but not full dates. --[[User:Perry Middlemiss|Perry Middlemiss]] ([[User talk:Perry Middlemiss|talk]]) 00:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

=====I support Option #2 (commemorative links only)=====