Revision as of 00:31, 13 April 2009 edit Perry Middlemiss (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 24,400 edits →I support Option #1 (link only relevant dates) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:07, 13 April 2009 edit undo The Duke of Waltham (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,682 edits →I support Option #1 (link only relevant dates): +1 Next edit →
Line 255: #'''Support''' - I expect that hardly ever would these links be appropriate. —[[User:Mattisse\|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse\|Talk]]) 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC) #'''Support''' This strikes me as the best option of the four. Removing all date linking is too harsh, offering no guidance is a mess, and allowing the first date reference to be linked is useful for years but not full dates. --[[User:Perry Middlemiss\|Perry Middlemiss]] ([[User talk:Perry Middlemiss\|talk]]) 00:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC) # I find this the most reasonable option: it avoids undue rigidity, but offers, at the same time, simple guidance based on established linking practice. [[User:The Duke of Waltham\|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham\|''The Duke of'']]</small> 01:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC) =====I support Option #2 (commemorative links only)=====

Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions