Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PeterSymonds (talk | contribs) m Unprotected Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Month-day responses: Closed too early |
|||
Line 332:
#'''Support''' The date pages have nothing of consequence to these articles, end the clutter and get rid of them all. You can still find them by typing it in the search box.- <font size="1" style="font-family:Zapfino, sans-serif">[[User:JLogan|<sub>J</sub>.Logan`]][[User talk:JLogan|<sup>t</sup>]]</font>: 11:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' perhaps with a caveat that we add a small non-guidance statement to MOSNUM or MOSLINK stateing explicitly "Links to dates are not treated any differently than links to other articles." or some such. Not necessary, but may be helpful. --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 14:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Dates are not special. Jayron32's suggestion for a caveat is imminently sensible too; given the history of the affair, a sentence that explicitly states "not special" might be a good idea. -- [[User:Fullstop|Fullstop]] ([[User talk:Fullstop|talk]]) 12:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
=====Other comments=====
| |||