Wikipedia:Date formatting and linking poll/Autoformatting responses: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments regarding autoformatting: I'll do my part, but you need to do plenty more reading first... |
And the point was? |
||
Line 831:
:::::::: The GFDL ''does'' say that whoever the republishing agent is, individual or corporation, they have to take credit for their modification. And you're quite right, thwacking a copyright notice, along with the required change of title and the acceptance of credit could well be enough – but the foundation doesn't. The copyright notice linked from every article says explicitly that copyright is held by the editors, and not by the foundation. ''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]] [[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]] <small>2009-04-13 20:25 z</small>''
::::::::: So argue for them to put a copyright notice on. That's irrelevant to the discussion. It's also slightly ingenuous of you to start with that quote when I never said anything of the sort; I know you will say neither did you, but to head the reply that way implies that. I know... let's suggest that every phrase, word or quote used in wikipedia should have markup and copyright references. So if I quote Churchill I better make sure I have a good source (History of the Engish-Speaking Peoples, perhaps) and make sure that I check whether it is in or out of copyright. What nonsense. The copyright issue is completely irrelevant, and whatever red herrings there were, you didn't point them out. Discussion is over, in fewer than 200 words. [[User:SimonTrew|SimonTrew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
;To answer Martindelaware's question (support 189):
| |||