Revision as of 06:52, 16 April 2009 edit GregorB (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 185,113 edits →Nowrap: Re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:18, 16 April 2009 edit undo GregorB (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 185,113 edits →Nowrap: Would make sense Next edit →
Line 93: ::Nowrap may well be the default but - as you've noted - this could cause problems (but to what extent, it's hard to say). What I had in mind is to add the nowrap option, but make it default to "off" so as to be on the safe side by not changing the behavior of existing transclusions. This could be the initial setup, at any rate. [[User:GregorB\|GregorB]] ([[User talk:GregorB\|talk]]) 06:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC) ::I tried to find an existing table that could cause problems with dts nowrap, but I could not find any. On the other hand, I found many that would benefit from nowrap. So yes, I'd say nowrap=on would really make sense as the default. [[User:GregorB\|GregorB]] ([[User talk:GregorB\|talk]]) 09:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Template talk:Date table sorting: Difference between revisions