Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) |
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 574:
:::::I think we should leave Ohconfucius alone with his rather silly ideas regarding "consensus". —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 11:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Ohconfucius and Locke, just carry on hitting each other on the head with your sandbuckets if you’d like to see me propose a page ban for you on ANI. At a minimum, please say something actually witty to each other next time. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 15:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
::::::: Trout, anyone? ;-) [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 15:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
::::The formatdate parser function? People argued that the existing systems syntax was "too complicated" by virtue of it using square brackets (as with normal links). I can only imagine the kind of complaints we'd receive if we forced people to mark dates up using <nowiki><code>{{#formatdate:November 11, 2001}}</code></nowiki>... There's been a proposal to simply remove the linking in the software, but for whatever reason this continues to be resisted. It's simpler, doesn't involve the use of bots, and keeps dates auto formatted. (And of course the other issues can be fixed with time, assuming opponents don't try for RFC5 and a half...). —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 11:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |||