Revision as of 23:59, 23 April 2009 edit RexxS (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 43,075 edits →Article list: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:31, 24 April 2009 edit undo GFHandel (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 12,534 edits →Article list: Yes and no... Next edit →
Line 628: * Article [[MM]] contains a relevant link to date article [[2000]] --[[User:RexxS\|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS\|talk]]) 23:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC) :*I agree that bots should be used, and that an exclusion list might be a solution; but remember that an article could have a relevant date link as well as irrelevant date links. I'd have to be honest and say that I don't believe the link to 2000 is relevant in the MM article. Someone might be interested to find out that MM and 2000 can be synonymous, but why that means they would be interested in finding out what else happened in 2000 is beyond me. [[User:HWV258\|<b><font style="color:Navy;background:LightSteelBlue;font-family:Arial" size="2"> HWV258 </font></b>]] 00:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Date formatting and linking poll: Difference between revisions