Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:13, 7 May 2009

Revision as of 08:13, 9 May 2009

Line 206:

::::WTF!?! That's crazy! <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 15:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

:::::Yeah, this is actually a bug that affects all characters which are used to denote list wikimarkup, and one I've bashed my head against trying to fix more than once (unfortunately, there are often cases where simply enclosing it in &lt;nowiki/> tags won't work, such as the above (I think)). I have the distinct feeling that the only reason other markup doesn't do this as well is because list wikimarkup is really the only type that requires a single character to trip the parser. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">「[[User:Dinoguy1000|ダイノ]][[User talk:Dinoguy1000|<span style="color: #080; font-weight: normal;">ガイ</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style="color: #F90;">千</span>]]？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)}</span> 18:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

== sandbox notice ==

Just wondering what people think about automatically adding a notice to the [[:Category:WikiProject banners under development|sandbox versions]] of the banner templates. Putting the following at the top of [[Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage]] would do it.

<pre>

{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{SUBPAGENAME}}}}|sandbox|{{Template sandbox notice}}}}

</pre>

-- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 17:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

:Go for it! —[[User:Ms2ger|Ms2ger]] ([[User talk:Ms2ger|talk]]) 18:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

::Done. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 21:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

== Reassessment flag? ==

Any idea how common they are, or how wanted they would be by the general project population? [[WP:USRD]] has one, and I was thinking of adding one to [[WP:CFB]] via a note parameter. But it made me wonder; if this is a pretty common feature, perhaps it could be something that goes into the base, much like "attention=" and "needs-infobox". We could have "reassess=", which puts articles into "Category:<project> articles needing reassessment". Any thoughts? <font color="red">[[User:DeFaultRyan|'''De''']]</font><font color="green">[[User Talk:DeFaultRyan|'''Fault''']]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/DeFaultRyan|'''Ryan''']]</font> 14:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

:In my experience this is not a very widely used feature, so I would suggest a note. However, I was going to suggest ''image-needed'' as a general feature because these are very common. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks for the info on both counts. Gonna request the note for [[WP:CFB]]. <font color="red">[[User:DeFaultRyan|'''De''']]</font><font color="green">[[User Talk:DeFaultRyan|'''Fault''']]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/DeFaultRyan|'''Ryan''']]</font> 16:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)