Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CSDCheckBot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:21, 10 May 2009

Revision as of 00:20, 11 May 2009

Line 125:

:(e/c) '''Objection'''. Before leaving any messages on user talk pages, it should first be tested in the bot's user space only. Given the above expressed disagreement for automatic notifications, we should at least first determine the notifications will be correct. --[[User:JLaTondre| JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top|talk]]) 16:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

*I don't object to the trial and I think the nature of the bot is helpful. I have a suggestion. Instead of widespread warnings (at first), we should have the bot populate a log of deletions, denials and mistaggings. Basically we log all actions to get a flavor for the volume of messages we can expect this bot to generate. If the bot is fairly accurate ''and'' the number of notifications will be fairly large, we both avoid flooding talk pages immediately ''and'' we have a local record of how and why the problem exists. once we get a feel for how many mistagged articles there are per day, we can decide whether or not to keep the record. I would recommend ''keeping'' the record so we can determine what the biggest contributors to poor tagging are (speed of tagging, topic, editor, tool, etc). Thoughts? [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 22:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

::I suggest we make the first trial only with the keeping ofarticles/removal of speedy tags , not with replacement of reasons. thats the more important part, and we should keep it simple at first. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 00:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)