Content deleted Content added
Agent007bond (talk | contribs) m →Limitation - Should be obvious: corrected indentation |
|||
Line 92:
::What I mentioned is that a thief physically present with a card does not always have to steal it as normally expected of him. He can simply copy down the card number, CVV2 and other details ''without the knowledge of the cardholder''. Although this kind of memory-based stealing will not allow the thief to make card-swiped transactions, he can still make Internet-based transactions such as purchasing membership access to websites.
::--[[User:Agent007bond|ADTC]] ([[User talk:Agent007bond|talk]]) 03:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
::I have scratched my CVV off the signature strip once I was sure I'd remebered it. I know the card is now officially void but it means no one can now read the CVV without my knowledge and use it for online transactions. In what physcial cases could my card now be rejected? The cashier would have to look closely at the back of the card to see the 'void' word which now shows through from underneath the signature strip. [[User:Hrf|hrf]] ([[User talk:Hrf|talk]]) 20:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
| |||