Revision as of 20:45, 11 May 2009 edit JLaTondre (talk \| contribs) Administrators 45,055 edits →Discussion: thanks + request ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:45, 18 May 2009 edit undo OverlordQ (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 27,628 edits m Requesting operator response Next edit →
Line 128: I agree that a log-only run is essential to confirm that the bot is functioning as intended before it actually posts on talkpages. After I finish going over the code for bugs later today, I intend to run it for twenty-four hours in that manner. After I've had a chance to go over the data that produces, I'll start the 7-day trial. I'll figure out what the specific parameters of the trial will be (what the bot will post messages for, etc) after I've gone over the data for the log run. Also, Protonk, I do intend to have the bot maintain some sort of a permanent centralized log. I have not yet determined precisely what form that log will take.--[[User:Dycedarg\|<span style="border:1px solid red;color:red; padding:1px;background:#000">'''Dycedarg'''</span>]] [[User talk:Dycedarg\|'''<span style="color:#000000">ж</span>''']] 19:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC) :Thank you. I, for one, would appreciate it if you gave folks a day to look at the results of the 24hr run & provide feedback before moving on to the second step. I think the less debate there is about the validity of what it is reporting, the better off it will be in the long run. --[[User:JLaTondre\| JLaTondre]] ([[User talk:JLaTondre#top\|talk]]) 20:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC) *{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} What is the current status of this request? [[User:OverlordQ\|<span style="color:#171788;font-weight:bold">Q</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:OverlordQ\|T]] [[Special:Contributions/OverlordQ\|C]]</sup> 17:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CSDCheckBot: Difference between revisions