Revision as of 14:34, 12 November 2005 edit Aude (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 40,098 edits →Proposed Wikiproject:External links ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:10, 23 November 2005 edit undo Boivie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,025 edits Multiple requests for help. Next edit →
Line 372: ::I agree that many good and useful websites contain ads. There should be no hard-and-fast rule regarding ads, as its more of a case-by-case judgment. The consideration should be the ratio of ads vs. useful content. If a site has more ads than content and information, then I'd favor deleting it. Or it the topic is ''less'' notable, maybe an ad-supported site is the only (or one of few) references and then would be okay. --[[User:Kmf164\|Kmf164]] 14:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC) == Multiple requests for help. == What about requesting help from lots of users simultaniously? Like the translations of Encyclopædia Britannica articles [[User:Armour]] were asking for. Doesn't it count as spam in some way? How should it be dealt with? --[[User:Boivie\|Boivie]] 22:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Spam: Difference between revisions