Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
[[US Army]] Regulation 5–11 (AR 5-11)<ref>"Management of Army Models and Simulations", Army Regulation 5–11, Headquarters of the [[US Department of the Army]] HQDA), 1 February 2005 [http://www.apd.army.mil/jw2/xmldemo/r5_11/head.asp]</ref> introduced the '''Army Model and Simulation Executive Council''' ('''AMSEC''') as an organization to:
* Recommend planning and prioritization guidance to the DCS, G-3/5/7<ref group="nb">See the [[Continental Staff System]] for an explanation of "letter-number" designations.</ref> concerning the requirements, management, and use of M&S in the Army.
* Recommend strategic policy guidance to the DUSA(OR) concerning the management of all Army M&S.
* Recommend program direction to the DUSA(OR) concerning the development of standards for all Army M&S.
Line 57:
The '''SMART''' concept as major [[US Army]] policy began with a letter dated 21 March 2000, addressed to the [[Office of the Secretary of Defense]], Service secretaries, the [[Defense Intelligence Agency]], and the [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]]; it is cosigned by the [[Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics]] (USD(AT&L)) and the [[Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)]]: "We have stressed that we must make better use of modeling and simulation (M&S) to improve the acquisition process, reduce costs, enhance T&E [test and evaluation], and shorten development times for our. We are convinced that efficient use of M & S throughout the system life cycle will net great dividends in efficiencies."<ref> O'Bryon, James F., "DoD's modeling and simulation reform in support of acquisition: stop kicking the M & S can down the road", 1 Mar 2006 [http://www.thefreelibrary.com/DoD%27s+modeling+and+simulation+reform+in+support+of+acquisition:+stop...-a0144387614]</ref>
== Notes ==
<references group="nb" />
==See also==
| |||