Talk:Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 2:
 
[[User:SynergeticMaggot|Zos]] 19:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 
 
not bad but umm, i dont think its appropriate to put this in neuroscience at all (pseudoscience if anything.) Is there a category for cognitive development? evolutionary psychology? new age/occult books? Also wouldn't this fall under the grounds of semiotics? And no, I haven't even read the book.
 
Oh also, theres a bit of a super geeky pun on the front page, "help improve the human biocomputer by expanding it"! (I love it!)
[[User:Universal Logic|Universal Logic]] ([[User talk:Universal Logic|talk]]) 07:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)