Content deleted Content added
NevilleDNZ (talk | contribs) m Unicode and APL |
|||
Line 161:
:I wrote the original paragraph and did use '''apparent''' because, if lazy evaluation was used, the interpreter would appear to complete calculations which, in fact, were deferred until needed. But then someone came along and trashed the idea that lazy evaluation was used. I had always believed this was true and, having worked for IBM for some 38 years, had been told this was true, but I couldn't prove it. Can someone else speak with more authority on this? –[[User:Shoaler|Shoaler]] ([[User talk:Shoaler|talk]]) 10:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
== Unicode and APL ==
Just note to remind myself to fix this later...
The character above the I-key (looks like a drunk tilda ~) does not have a unicode character listed in the unicode table. (Also epsilon unicode is missing)
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 17:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
| |||