Content deleted Content added
→Software: It is very important to notice that a prominent software maker made it's odf-implementation so that it is not interoperable with other odf-compatible software. |
Fix cite template(s) and other AWB general fixes Tag: references removed |
||
Line 1:
{{distinguish2|[[Office Open XML]] (another XML document format), or [[Open Document Architecture]], an unrelated, earlier ISO standard document file format, or the related but not identical [[OpenDocument Foundation]], or [[OpenDoc]], the multi-platform software componentry framework standard for compound documents}}
{{redirect|ODF}}
{{OpenDocument}}
{{Infobox file format
Line 122 ⟶ 123:
}}
The '''OpenDocument''' format (ODF) is a [[file format]] for electronic office documents such as [[spreadsheet
While the specifications were originally developed by [[Sun Microsystems|Sun]], the standard was developed by the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC - OASIS ODF TC <ref>{{cite web
| url=http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
Line 234 ⟶ 235:
*[[Adobe Buzzword]], the online word processor by [[Adobe Systems]], imports and exports OpenDocument (ODT) files.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/buzzword/ |title=Adobe Buzzword online word processor from Acrobat.com |publisher=Labs.adobe.com |date= |accessdate=2009-05-19}}</ref>
*[[AbiWord]] <ref>http://www.abisource.com/wiki/OpenDocument</ref><ref name="tracked-changes">http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/05/13/tracked-changes.aspx</ref><ref name="abiword">[http://www.abisource.com/release-notes/2.4.2.phtml Abiword 2.4.2 Release Notes]. Retrieved 2009-03-03</ref> (Users of Windows installations must first download and install Import/Export Plugins)
*[[Google Docs]] <ref name="tracked-changes" /><ref>http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Docs/thread?tid=014457aa446500fa&hl=en</ref
*[[IBM]] [[Lotus Symphony]] <ref>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/05/09/1-2-1.aspx</ref><ref>http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/help.nsf/ReleaseNotes</ref>
*[[KOffice]] <ref name="tracked-changes" /><ref>http://koffice.org/filters/1.6/</ref
*[[Microsoft Office 2000]], [[Microsoft Office XP|Office XP]], [[Microsoft Office 2003|Office 2003]], [[Microsoft Office 2007|Office 2007]] with plugin
*With Service Pack 2 Microsoft added ODF-support to [[Microsoft Office 2007#Service Pack 2|Microsoft Office 2007]] but at the same time Microsoft re-used formula language from a originally Microsoft-developed [[OOXML]]. With this conflict of standards Microsoft actually managed to reduce interoperability between office productivity software.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=18317 |title=In Office SP2, Microsoft manages to reduce interoperability |accessdate=2009-05-23 |last=Allison |first=Jeremy |date=2009-05-19 |work=ZDNet }}</ref><ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/microsofts_odf_support_falls_short/ |title=Microsoft’s ODF Support Falls Short |accessdate=2009-05-22 |date=2009-05-19 |work=Open Document Alliance |publisher=[[ODF Alliance]] }}</ref><ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html |title=Update on ODF Spreadsheet Interoperability |accessdate=2009-05-22 |last=Weir |first=Rob |date=2009-05-03 }}</ref>
Line 347 ⟶ 348:
| url=http://www.w3.org/Math/
| title=MathML W3C standard
|
| url=http://silas.psfc.mit.edu/mathmltalk/mathmlIAP06.pdf
| title=Web Publishing Mathematics With HTML and MathML from TeX
Line 376 ⟶ 377:
}}</ref> A major downside of TeX is that Tex is a presentation-only markup: unlike MathML, it does not offer a semantic markup model. This means it is impossible for a computer algebra system to reliably understand the meaning of TeX markup. TeX is useful only for typesetting.
* The OpenDocument Format 1.0-1.1 specifications refer to '[[ZIP (file format)|zip]]' files but do not reference a standard which describes the zip file format. However, a specification (as opposed to a "standard") for the Zip format was distributed with [[PKZIP]] in the file APPNOTE.TXT and this continues to be maintained.<ref>[http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT APPNOTE.TXT - .ZIP File Format Specification]</ref>
* ODF format has limited support for tracking changes, which may be a problem in environments where review is required by law, for financial or medical purposes.<ref
* The [[OpenDocument Foundation|OpenDocument Foundation, Inc.]] participated in developing ODF within the OASIS TC and in developing the closed‐source [http://web.archive.org/web/20070202013412/http://opendocument.foundation.googlepages.com/ daVinci plug-in] for Microsoft Office. The Foundation shifted its attention from supporting OpenDocument to supporting the W3C [[Compound Document Format]] (CDF). The reason stated was: “it is important to recognize that ODF does not adequately respect existing standards and does not address the market's requirements for a single Universal Document Format with which any and all applications can work on an equal basis”.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/10/cdf-disrupting-.html
Line 391 ⟶ 392:
Since July 2008, [[NATO]] has added ISO/IEC 26300:2006 (ODF 1.0) to its list of mandatory standards for all members.<ref>[http://nhqc3s.nato.int/architecture/_docs/NISPv2/volume2/ch03s04.html 3.4. NNEC Core Enterprise Services]</ref>
=== Adoptions (National Level) ===
[[Belgium]] – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 399 ⟶ 400:
|date=2006-06-23
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.news.com/2100-7344_3-6087275.html
|publisher=CNET News
Line 405 ⟶ 406:
|date=2006-06-23
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.techworld.com/applications/news/index.cfm?newsID=6335&pagtype=all
|publisher=Techworld
Line 411 ⟶ 412:
|date=2006-06-29
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.belgif.be/index.php/File_type_and_document_formats
|publisher=Belgian Government Interoperability Framework
Line 417 ⟶ 418:
|date=2007-09-18
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.odfworkshop.com/2007_berlin/3.pdf
|publisher=Presentation of Chief Information Officer, FEDICT, at the 1st International ODF User Workshop
Line 423 ⟶ 424:
|date=2007-10-29
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.odfworkshop.com/presentations/Strickx_Pretoria_081009.pdf
|publisher=Presentation of Chief Information Officer, FEDICT, at the 2nd International ODF User Workshop
Line 437 ⟶ 438:
Government agencies are permitted to:
* Use other formats when creating and distributing documents internally
[[Brazil]] – 2006, 2008 <ref>{{cite news
Line 448:
Under e-PING Standards of Interoperability for Electronic Government v 4.0 (16 Dec 2008), ODF was upgraded from “recommended” under v 2.0 (17 Dec 2006) to “adopted”, meaning ODF compliance is now mandatory . Government agencies are required to incorporate “adopted” file formats like ODF into new information systems and upgrades to existing systems.
[[Croatia]] – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 463 ⟶ 462:
** PDF
** HTML
[[Denmark]] – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 477 ⟶ 475:
Government entities are permitted to:
* Refrain from implementing the new OOXML and ODF standard if doing so would incur “additional costs or inconveniences” or raise “IT security concerns”
[[France]] – 2006<ref>{{cite news
Line 485 ⟶ 482:
|date=2006-11-14
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=
|publisher=National Assembly, France
Line 515 ⟶ 512:
Government agencies are prohibited from:
* Migrating to any productivity suite formats other than ODF
[[Germany]] – 2008<ref>{{cite news
Line 528 ⟶ 524:
Under Germany's Standards and Architectures for eGovernment Applications 4.0 (SAGA 4.0), ODF recommended for editable text documents, a multi-stakeholder initiative that recommends and mandates standards to be used by the German federal government.
[[Japan]] – 2007, 2008<ref>{{cite news
Line 548 ⟶ 543:
* Provides tax reductions for companies which buy open-standard based software
* Went into effect April 2008 and expires in March 2011.
[[Malaysia]] – 2008<ref>{{cite news
Line 570 ⟶ 564:
Malaysian Administrative Modernization and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU) adopting ODF for all new documents created from April 1, 2008 onwards.
[[Netherlands]] – 2007<ref>{{cite news
Line 578 ⟶ 571:
|date=2007-11-01
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.osor.eu/news/nl-government-instructs-itself-to-use-open-standards
|publisher=Open Source Observatory
Line 596 ⟶ 589:
* Instructions published 24 Nov 2008 making open-standards based procurement the default for public purchases of IT worth more than 50,000 euro
* Use of open standards such as ODF – official listed as one of the approved open standards - is now mandatory ("comply or explain” why not).
[[Norway]] – 2007<ref>{{cite news
Line 615 ⟶ 607:
Government agencies are permitted to:
* Use other formats, but only if they also produce the documents in PDF or ODF format.
[[Russia]] – 2007<ref>{{cite news
Line 625 ⟶ 616:
* Legislative requirements to mandate the procurement of software based on how well it adheres to widely-used standards.
* Support of ODF in e-gov framework
[[South Africa]] – 2007<ref>{{cite news
Line 645 ⟶ 635:
** For office suite documents provided in presentation view: XHTML or PDF
* Work collaboratively with stakeholders on openness plans
[[Switzerland]] – 2007<ref>{{cite news
Line 653 ⟶ 642:
|date=2007-07-24
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.epractice.eu/document/3724
|publisher=ePractice.eu
Line 666 ⟶ 655:
** ODF (“recommended under observation”)
** OOXML (“recommended under observation”)
[[Uruguay]] – 2008<ref>{{cite news
Line 679 ⟶ 667:
* ODF for editable documents
* PDF for documents in final, published form
[[Venezuela]] – 2009<ref>{{cite news
|url=http://www.tsj.gov.ve/gaceta/enero/290109/290109-39109-28.html
|publisher=Tribunal Supremo de Justícia
Line 693 ⟶ 679:
* Use ODF for editable documents
* Use PDF for non-editable documents
[[United Kingdom]] – 2008<ref>{{cite news
Line 726 ⟶ 711:
** ASCII (open)
** RTF (acceptable)
[[Assam]] ([[India]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 734 ⟶ 718:
|date=2007-10-01
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.odfworkshop.com/2007%5Fberlin/9.pdf
|publisher=Heise Online
Line 745 ⟶ 729:
* Use ODF
* Transition to open-source operating systems
[[Extremadura]] ([[Spain]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 753 ⟶ 736:
|date=2007-08-01
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/issues/2006/6/up7-6Millan.pdf
|publisher=Upgrade
Line 763 ⟶ 746:
Government agencies are required to:
* Create and save in ODF (manipulable) or PDF/A (static) format all documents that will be exchanged with other government entities or with citizens.
[[Hong Kong]] ([[China]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 777 ⟶ 759:
* Exchange spreadsheets in ODF, or a mutually agreed-upon legacy format
* Exchange slideshow-type presentations in ODF, or a mutually-agreed-upon legacy format
[[Kerala]] ([[India]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 790 ⟶ 771:
* ODF
* Unicode
[[Massachusetts]] ([[United States]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 808 ⟶ 788:
** RTF (acceptable)
** PDF (acceptable)
[[Misiones]] ([[Argentina]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 820 ⟶ 799:
Government agencies are required to:
* Create and save in ODF (manipulable) or PDF/A (static) format all documents that will be exchanged with other government entities or with citizens
[[Paraná]] ([[Brazil]]) – 2007 <ref>{{cite news
Line 828 ⟶ 806:
|date=2007-12-18
|accessdate=2009-04-23
}}</ref>
|url=http://celepar7cta.pr.gov.br/SEEG/sumulas.nsf/319b106715f69a4b03256efc00601826/a4d30af5cd3749bc832573be00431df8?OpenDocument
|publisher=Casa Civil do Governo do Estado do Paraná
Line 860 ⟶ 838:
{{FLOSS}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Opendocument}}
[[Category:OpenDocument]]
[[Category:Open formats]]
| |||