Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/DG: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 30:
#: I've edited under [[User:Not Wikipedia Administrator]] and under [[User:207.99.6.125]], and I stand by my full edit histories. I encourage prospective voters ''very strongly'' to examine them personally, as they're the best way to get to know a candidate as an editor and Wikipedian. [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 03:01, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
# '''Being an arbitrator requires a finely tuned bullshit detector. What in your life has prepared you to detect bullshit with ease?''' [[User:Snowspinner|Phil Sandifer]] 21:20, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
#: I'm actually very glad you asked me this. More than anything else, having gone through the new jersey public schooling system has necessarily made me a brilliant expert at both processing and generating bullshit of any and every classification. In fact, if I could name only one thing I'm terrific at, it's processing and generating bullshit. In a more wikipedian context, I am sure that if you just take a cursory look at my edits you will find yourself rolling in bullshit. This should settle any doubts. [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 00:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
| |||