Revision as of 17:06, 8 June 2009 edit Nageh (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,862 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:46, 8 June 2009 edit undo Oli Filth (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,040 edits →Start again Next edit →
Line 190: ::::: Edit: I rather vote for removing the reference to MDPC codes. ::::: [[User:Nageh\|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh\|talk]]) 16:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC) :::::: I see your point on why LDPC construction is special, and I think we agree that it means that MDPC is no more relevant than any other code construction. [[User:Oli Filth\|Oli Filth]]<sup>([[User talk:Oli Filth\|talk]]<nowiki>\|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/Oli_Filth\|contribs]])</sup> 18:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC) :Regarding randomness, I do not recall randomness being a central criterion in the definition of LDPC codes; in fact, you could very well construct low-density parity check matrices algebraically and deterministically, it's just that randomized constructions turn out to be superior.

Talk:Low-density parity-check code: Difference between revisions