Talk:Middleware (distributed applications): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:10, 1 July 2009

Revision as of 15:11, 1 July 2009

Line 122:

== Mixing Tools with protocoles ==

It seems that many definitions are done by people that do not work with technology: is really wrong to mix protocols with tools like in the Hurwitz article:"I divide the middleware market into six categories: asynchronous remote procedure call, publish/subscribe, message-oriented middleware, object request brokers (ORBs), SQL-oriented data access middleware, and synchronous RPC". When RPC has become a middleware? Marketing vaporware has created a mess around technology definitions.

The article has to be reviewed by someone not involved in selling stuff. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/158.102.29.146|158.102.29.146]] ([[User talk:158.102.29.146|talk]]) 15:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

The article has to be reviewed by someone not involved in selling stuff.