Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffiti Blasters: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
TonyTheTiger (talk | contribs) Keep |
|||
Line 12:
*'''Keep''' Local government painting over graffiti doesn't look particularly significant. But there are several sources addressing the specific program: [http://books.google.com/books?id=j0QOBsB3tUIC&pg=PA214&dq=%22Graffiti+Blasters%22], [http://books.google.com/books?id=_BTrVy_OFkMC&pg=PA169&dq=%22Graffiti+Blasters%22], [http://books.google.com/books?id=rvglqO_gtYkC&pg=PA81&dq=%22Graffiti+Blasters%22], [http://books.google.com/books?id=GgSZuU0AVtcC&pg=PA275&dq=%22Graffiti+Blasters%22&lr=].--[[User:Ethicoaestheticist|Ethicoaestheticist]] ([[User talk:Ethicoaestheticist|talk]]) 22:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''WEEEAAAK Keep''' Topicwise, I do not understand why it is encyclopedic at the international level. It seems like a local government program. However, {{u|Ethicoaestheticist}} has convinced me it is [[WP:N]] according to our guidelines.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|c]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|bio]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:LOTM]]) </small> 03:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. It's a local govt program, but it's one that's received wider coverage in several contexts. There is critical analysis/more than just passing mention in publications other than local news. And major coverage of one particular event. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 15:09, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||