Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Redwolf24: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Questions from [[User:-Ril-]]: replies |
|||
Line 74:
--Victim of signature fascism 16:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
:I am apolitical, in the manner that I know about politics, but I choose to not associate myself with either of the major parties, or any minor parties. It's ridiculous the only people that can get power are those who have to be completely right or left to get a party's support. America is not Black or White in politics, most of us are grey, but our leaders must be on a polar end. I'm not biased for these reasons.
:I would not go with the flow nor head-on contest other arbitrators. The first guy has to read all evidence, and I would read all evidence even if we had 3/0/0 on an issue.
:The third question has such an obvious answer it only looks as if it is your personal opinion that arbitrators do this, which I strongly doubt as they're good people. If they do (unlikely, more likely a POV) then we should change that.
:All parties can be investigated, and should be. Arbs should be able to investigate too. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">R</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">dwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle3|<font color="gray">Attention Washingtonians!</font>]] 01:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from Marsden==
| |||