Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Wik: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
replying to some older comments. i'll probably reply to wik in a few minutes |
||
Line 58:
::::: No doubt there will be future cases in which arbitration committee decisions are subject to interpretation. Folks have to use their judgement, in the end. Sysops who have a pattern of bad judgements will probably be asked by the community to resign as sysop. [[User:MyRedDice|Martin]] 18:17, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I'd urge others to follow Martin's lead here - don't worry too much about how you measure the day. There's a certain amount of flexibility as to how to interpret "day" in the ruling. If you use your best judgement and act in good faith, you should be fine.
I'm a bit disappointed that some are saying this remedy is a failure so soon, by the way. If after a month or two things are no better or are even worse than they were before, then we can probably say this rememdy hasn't done us much good, but to me it seems too early to be making such judgements just yet. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]]
==Clarification request==
| |||