Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Silverback: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Put questions here: New questions |
|||
Line 54:
==Question from [[User:Sean Black|Sean Black]]==
You recently filed an [[WP:RfC]] on the "admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse", which was moved into your userspace following a debate at [[WP:MFD]]. I filed an outside view which referred to you as a "[[internet troll|troll]]" (for which I apologize; I disagreed with your point and presentation, but it was still valid); do you still feel strongly about the nature of the "admin culture", and do you feel that you could work well with your fellow arbitrators, most of whom are administrators? Additionally, do you feel administrators who abuse their powers are very common, and, if so, how do you feel they should be dealt with? Thank you in advance for you answers, Silverback.--[[User:Sean Black|Sean]]|[[User talk:Sean Black|Bla]]<font color="green">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|ck]]</font> 04:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]]==
Given your response at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Intelligent design]], why do you feel that you would be level headed enough for the ArbCom? I realise I'm going back quite some way, but I haven't seen any evidence you've changed your ways since then. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 06:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||