Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Jpgordon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20:
*In that particular case, very much so. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]][[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]] 05:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for answering the question directly, JP. Another candidate might not have been so willing to be accountable for his past behavior. [[User:Marsden|Marsden]] 05:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from BDell555==
Could you provide an example of someone "editing in good faith but blinded by political views" such that he or she should be indefinitely blocked? Would somone who is known to be associated with an organization like stormfront.org be an example? How about someone associated with the [[Muslim Brotherhood]] or, alternatively, a contemporary equivalent of the [[Stern gang]]?
Would you revert an edit that sources a publication by a controversial organization like ihr.org even if it could be proven that the document cited was 100% accurate and/or endorsed as fully accurate by another, uncontroversial organization? If so, which other organizations would you consider to be in need of the same treatment? Would you deny, without further inquiry into the document's claims, arguments, or methodology, the possibility that any document or publication by such an organization could be possibly be accurate?[[User:Bdell555|Bdell555]] 07:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||