Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Filiocht: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Questions from [[User:-Ril-]]: replying |
|||
Line 113:
--Victim of signature fascism 16:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from Marsden==
Many people have noted that Wikipedia's original communitarian structure is no longer functioning very well. One editor has [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2005/Candidate_statements/Jpgordon suggested] that ArbCom is "about getting the trains to run on time," which is a reference to a fulfulled promise of Mussolini's fascist government. Do you agree that Wikipedia needs to become more orderly, and if so, do you think there are any options other than a move toward a more centrally controlled authoritarian system? Do you think that the spirit of cooperation in Wikipedia would survive such a change? [[User:Marsden|Marsden]] 15:54, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||