Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Silverback: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Marsden (talk | contribs)
Jguk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 67:
 
Many people have noted that Wikipedia's original communitarian structure is no longer functioning very well. One editor has [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2005/Candidate_statements/Jpgordon suggested] that ArbCom is "about getting the trains to run on time," which is a reference to a fulfulled promise of Mussolini's fascist government. Do you agree that Wikipedia needs to become more orderly, and if so, do you think there are any options other than a move toward a more centrally controlled authoritarian system? Do you think that the spirit of cooperation in Wikipedia would survive such a change? [[User:Marsden|Marsden]] 16:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 
{{User:Jguk/ArbCom questions}}