Content deleted Content added
CarlHewitt (talk | contribs) →Disputed: response to Arthur Rubin |
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) →Disputed: further reply to CarlHewitt |
||
Line 85:
:::::Thanks. I clarified the discuussion of open systems. Please see what you think. Thanks,--[[User:CarlHewitt|Carl Hewitt]] 21:45, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
::::::I understand the argument, now. (Please merge the duplicate paragraphs.) It's still not due to what ''I'' would call "indeterminacy", but due to the structure of the external interface. In other words -- any system with asynchronus external inputs cannot be simply modeled by logic or "traditional" computation theory. It doesn't have anything to do with "indeterminacy", quantum effects, relativistic light cones, or anything else you've combined with it in the past. If you want to further '''ambiguate''' [[indeterminacy]], go right ahead -- but that's what you'll need to do for me to remove the *disputed* tag. [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] | [[User_talk:Arthur_Rubin|(talk)]] 22:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||