Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Silverback: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Silverback (talk | contribs) |
Silverback (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 78:
''Q: How many hours a month do you think you will need to be a good Arbitrator and are you really willing to put in the time?''
A: I can be good arbitrator in terms of quality in just a couple hours a month depending on the complexity of the case, I won't sign off on decisions I haven't researched. However, I assume you are using "good" somehow in the sense of quantity of work, rather than quality. I expect that I will be able to average about 30 to 50 hours a month, but on occasions
''Q: If chosen, you will need to arbitrate on disputes arising from the creation or revision of articles. Experience of creating and revising articles yourself, particularly where it has involved collaboration, is very valuable in understanding the mindset of disputants who come to arbitration. With reference to your own edits in the main article namespace, please demonstrate why you think you have the right experience to be a good arbitrator.''
| |||