Revision as of 11:16, 8 June 2009 edit Daydreamer302000 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,197 edits Assessment. Sectioning. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:38, 29 July 2009 edit undo 195.169.128.3 (talk) →Too many code examples Next edit →
Line 77: :Ok, I've decided to [[WP:BOLD\|be bold]] and delete all but the Python example. --[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] ([[User talk:P3d0\|talk]]) 13:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC) ::The Python example should go as well. It uses a language mechanism with the same superficial behaviour and the same name, but it's not a precise example of the design pattern in question. Quoted from [[Python_syntax_and_semantics#Decorators]]: "Despite the name, Python decorators are not an implementation of the decorator pattern." [[Special:Contributions/195.169.128.3\|195.169.128.3]] ([[User talk:195.169.128.3\|talk]]) 08:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC) == Genericity of introduction ==

Talk:Decorator pattern: Difference between revisions