Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of website monitoring tools: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 4:
:{{la|Comparison of website monitoring tools}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Comparison of website monitoring tools|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of website monitoring tools]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of website monitoring tools|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 29#{{anchorencode:Comparison of website monitoring tools}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Article fails [[WP:NOT]] and [[WP:SPAM]]. Wikipedia is optimized for '''''readers''''' over editors, Pages consisting of redlinks are unhelpful to readers. Repositories of Red link articles '''do not''' [[Wikipedia:build the web|add content or meaning]] to the [[WP:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|encyclopedia]] [[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 21:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' while I think that almost all of the rationale for this deletion is only cause to edit the article, the first reason is sufficient: Article fails [[WP:NOT]]. It's certainly helpful, but it's not really WP's thing. Describing what a Web site monitoring tool ''is'' would be reasonable. Perhaps even listing some articles comparing them from the popular trade press would be fine, but such comparisons are ephemeral and their criteria subjective. Not encyclopedic. -[[User:Miskaton|Miskaton]] ([[User talk:Miskaton|talk]]) 22:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||